The full list of countries that have not been invaded is as follows: Andorra, Belarus, Bolivia, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Mali, Marshall Islands, Monaco, Mongolia, Paraguay, Sao Tome and Principe, Sweden, Tajikistan

Post Views: 115
Related posts:
- maritime boundaries between France and U.K(Great Britain and northern Ireland)
- maritime boundaries between Denmark and Great Britain
- maritime boundaries between Germany and Great Britain
- maritime boundaries between Great Britain and Netherlands
- The North Atlantic Coast Fisheries Case (Great Britain / United States of America), fact and decision
- maritime boundaries between Belgium and Great Britain
- exclusive economic zone(EEZ) map of the world
- what is the meaning ARCHIPELAGIC WATERS in the international law of the sea and LOSC?
- Table of claims to maritime jurisdiction (as at 15 July 2011)/maritime spaces of countries
- The Hague Conference for the Codification of International Law (1930)
- OECD REPORT LAUNCH: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS IN ARCTIC COUNCIL COUNTRIES
- Navigational Regimes of Particular Straits, Aland case study
- Exclusive Fishery Zones meaning and which countries have it?
- Residual Rights of countries on the EEZ based on law of the sea and customary international law
- Historic Rights of countries on the EEZ, based on law of the sea and customary international law
- Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge (Malaysia/Singapore)
- Presence of Third States as a RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES in delimitation process in law of the sea and customary international law
- maritime boundaries between Sweden and Estonia
- STATE CLAIMS IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 4 (LOSC ARTICLE 7), Vietnam case
- international law of the sea and The Right of Transit Passage on the international straits
- STATE CLAIMS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY WITH ARTICLE 4 (LOSC ARTICLE 7), The Netherlands case
- STATE CLAIMS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMITY WITH ARTICLE 4 (LOSC ARTICLE 7), Norway, Sweden, and Finland cases
- Maritime boundaries between Poland and Sweden
- STATE CLAIMS IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 4 (LOSC ARTICLE 7), France case
- maritime boundaries between Sweden and Lithuania
- Custom of the sea
- maritime boundaries between Germany and Sweden
- STATE CLAIMS IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 4 (LOSC ARTICLE 7), Italy case
- maritime boundaries between Latvia and Sweden
- maritime boundaries between Denmark and Poland
- STATE CLAIMS IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 4 (LOSC ARTICLE 7), lceland case
- maritime boundaries between Denmark and Sweden
- STATE CLAIMS IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 4 (LOSC ARTICLE 7), Australia case
- what is the meaning of Historic Bays on tle law of the sea and LOSC
- STATE CLAIMS IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 4 (LOSC ARTICLE 7), Cuba case
- Baselines or basepoints as a RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES in delimitation process in law of the sea and customary international law
- Finland claims about straight baselines and the median line separating the continental shelf and fishery zones of Finland from the continental shelves and exclusive economic zones of Estonia and Sweden
- maritime boundaries between Germany and Denmark
- Jurisdiction of Archipelagic States Over Archipelagic Waters(based on law of the sea, customary international law and LOSC)
- Maritime boundaries between Finland and Sweden