Legal Aspects of Inter-State Maritime Delimitation in the Eastern Mediterranean Basin

Legal Aspects of Inter-State Maritime Delimitation in the Eastern Mediterranean Basin, Are There Laws on the High Seas?, Can you do drugs in international waters?, Can you do whatever you want in international waters?, Definition of High Sea, freedom of high seas, High seas, high seas definition unclos, high seas map, high seas meaning, high seas meaning in business, high seas meaning in law, International waters, International Waters Laws, International waters map, Mare liberum, Territories & Zones, trans-boundary waters, What do you know about international waters?, What is legal in international waters?, What Laws Apply In International Waters?, Where are international waters?, Where are the high seas?, Where do international waters begin?, Why is it called high seas?

View More Legal Aspects of Inter-State Maritime Delimitation in the Eastern Mediterranean Basin

Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)

Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives

View More Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Mauritius and Maldives in the Indian Ocean (Mauritius/Maldives)

The M/V “Norstar” Case (Panama v. Italy)

On 17 December 2015, Panama filed an Application with the Tribunal dated 16 November 2015 instituting proceedings against Italy in a dispute between the two States concerning the interpretation and application of the Convention “in connection with the arrest and detention by Italy of M/V Norstar, an oil tanker registered under the flag of Panama”. The case was entered in the list of cases of the Tribunal as Case No. 25.

View More The M/V “Norstar” Case (Panama v. Italy)

The “Enrica Lexie” Incident (Italy v. India), Provisional Measures

On 26 June 2015, Italy instituted arbitration proceedings against India under Annex VII to the Convention in a dispute concerning “an incident … involving the M/V Enrica Lexie, an oil tanker flying the Italian flag, and India’s subsequent exercise of jurisdiction over the incident”.

View More The “Enrica Lexie” Incident (Italy v. India), Provisional Measures

Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire)

During consultations held by the President of the Tribunal with representatives of Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire on 2 and 3 December 2014, a special agreement was concluded between the two States on 3 December 2014 to submit the dispute concerning the delimitation of their maritime boundary in the Atlantic Ocean to a special chamber of the Tribunal to be formed pursuant to article 15, paragraph 2, of the Statute. An original copy of the special agreement was delivered to the Registry on 3 December 2014, which constituted the notification required under article 55 of the Rules. The case was entered in the Tribunal’s list of cases as Case No. 23.

View More Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire in the Atlantic Ocean (Ghana/Côte d’Ivoire)

The Arctic Sunrise Case (Kingdom of the Netherlands v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures

On 4 October 2013, the Netherlands instituted arbitral proceedings, under annex VII to the Convention, against the Russian Federation in a dispute concerning the “boarding and detention of the vessel Arctic Sunrise in the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation and the detention of the persons on board the vessel by the authorities of the Russian Federation”.

View More The Arctic Sunrise Case (Kingdom of the Netherlands v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures

Request for an advisory opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC)

The Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission is a regional fisheries organization composed of seven member States: Cabo Verde, Gambia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mauritania, Senegal and Sierra Leone. During its fourteenth session (27-28 March 2013), the Conference of Ministers of the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission adopted a resolution by which it decided, in accordance with article 33 of the Convention on the Determination of the Minimal Conditions for Access and Exploitation of Marine Resources within the Maritime Areas under Jurisdiction of the Member States of the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, of 2012, to authorize the Permanent Secretary of the Commission to seize the Tribunal in order to obtain its advisory opinion on the following matters:

View More Request for an advisory opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC)

The “ARA Libertad” Case (Argentina v. Ghana)

On 14 November 2012, Argentina filed with the Tribunal a request for the prescription of provisional measures under article 290, paragraph 5, of the Convention in a dispute concerning “the detention by Ghana […] of the warship ‘ARA Fragata Libertad’”. The case was entered into the Tribunal’s list of cases as Case No. 20.

View More The “ARA Libertad” Case (Argentina v. Ghana)

The M/V “Virginia G” Case (Panama/Guinea-Bissau)

On 4 July 2011, proceedings were instituted before the Tribunal through the notification of a special agreement in a dispute concerning the vessel Virginia G. By a letter dated 4 July 2011, the Agent of Panama notified the Tribunal of a special agreement concluded by exchange of notes, dated 29 June and 4 July 2011, between the Republic of Panama and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau, respectively, to submit to the Tribunal a dispute concerning the vessel Virginia G. The case was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 19.

View More The M/V “Virginia G” Case (Panama/Guinea-Bissau)

The M/V “Louisa” Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain)

On 24 November 2010, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines instituted proceedings before the Tribunal against Spain in a dispute concerning the arrest of the M/V Louisa. The Application instituting proceedings included a request for the prescription of provisional measures under article 290, paragraph 1, of the Convention. The case was entered in the Tribunal’s list of cases as Case No. 18.

View More The M/V “Louisa” Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Kingdom of Spain)

Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Seabed Disputes Chamber)

On 6 May 2010, the Council of the International Seabed Authority adopted decision ISBA/16/C/13, in which, in accordance with article 191 of the Convention, it requested the Seabed Disputes Chamber of the Tribunal to render an advisory opinion on the following questions: What are the legal responsibilities and obligations of States parties to the Convention with respect to the sponsorship of activities in the Area in accordance with the Convention, in particular part XI, and the 1994 Agreement relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982?
What is the extent of liability of a State party for any failure to comply with the provisions of the Convention, in particular part XI, and the 1994 Agreement, by an entity whom it has sponsored under article 153, paragraph 2(b), of the Convention?
What are the necessary and appropriate measures that a sponsoring State must take in order to fulfil its responsibility under the Convention, in particular article 139 and annex III, and the 1994 Agreement?

View More Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Seabed Disputes Chamber)

Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar)

On 14 December 2009, proceedings were instituted before the Tribunal in relation to the delimitation of the maritime boundary in the Bay of Bengal between Bangladesh and Myanmar.

View More Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar)

The “Tomimaru” Case (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release

On 6 July 2007, an Application under article 292 of the Convention was filed by Japan against the Russian Federation concerning the release of the fishing vessel Tomimaru. The Application was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 15.

View More The “Tomimaru” Case (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release

The “Hoshinmaru” Case (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release

On 6 July 2007, an Application under article 292 of the Convention was filed by Japan against the Russian Federation concerning the release of the fishing vessel Hoshinmaru and its crew. The Application was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 14.

View More The “Hoshinmaru” Case (Japan v. Russian Federation), Prompt Release

The “Juno Trader” Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea-Bissau), Prompt Release

On 18 November 2004, an Application under article 292 of the Convention was filed on behalf of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines against Guinea-Bissau for the release of the vessel Juno Trader, flying the flag of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and its crew. The Application was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 13.

View More The “Juno Trader” Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea-Bissau), Prompt Release

Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore), Provisional Measures

On 5 September 2003, a Request for the prescription of provisional measures, pending the constitution of an arbitral tribunal under Annex VII to the Convention, was filed with the Registry of the Tribunal by Malaysia pursuant to article 290, paragraph 5, of the Convention in a dispute concerning land reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor. The Request was accompanied by a copy of a document dated 4 July 2003, instituting arbitral proceedings against Singapore. The Request was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 12.

View More Case concerning Land Reclamation by Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor (Malaysia v. Singapore), Provisional Measures

The “Volga” Case (Russian Federation v. Australia), Prompt Release

On 2 December 2002, an Application under article 292 of the Convention was filed by the Russian Federation against Australia for the release of the vessel Volga, flying the flag of the Russian Federation. The Application was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 11.

View More The “Volga” Case (Russian Federation v. Australia), Prompt Release

The MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom), Provisional Measures

On 9 November 2001, a Request for the prescription of provisional measures, pending the constitution of the arbitral tribunal provided for in Annex VII to the Convention, was filed with the Registry of the Tribunal by Ireland, pursuant to article 290, paragraph 5, of the Convention concerning the “dispute” between Ireland and the United Kingdom “concerning the MOX plant, international movements of radioactive materials, and the protection of the marine environment of the Irish Sea”. A copy of a document dated 25 October 2001 instituting arbitral proceedings against the United Kingdom was appended to the Request. Ireland’s Request was entered in the List of cases as Case No. 10.

View More The MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom), Provisional Measures

The “Chaisiri Reefer 2” Case (Panama v. Yemen), Prompt Release

On 3 July 2001, an Application under article 292 of the Convention was filed on behalf of Panama against Yemen for the prompt release of the Chaisiri Reefer 2, a vessel flying the flag of Panama, its cargo and crew. The case was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 9.

View More The “Chaisiri Reefer 2” Case (Panama v. Yemen), Prompt Release

Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Union)

By an exchange of letters dated 18 and 19 December 2000, Chile and the European Community agreed to submit a dispute concerning the conservation and sustainable exploitation of swordfish stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean to a special chamber of the Tribunal to be formed in accordance with article 15, paragraph 2, of the Statute.By Order dated 20 December 2000, the Tribunal decided to accede to the request of the parties to form a special chamber to deal with the case and determined the composition of the Special Chamber with their approval. The composition of the Special Chamber was as follows: President: P. Chandrasekhara Rao, Members: Judge Hugo Caminos, Judge Alexander Yankov, Judge Rüdiger Wolfrum and Judge ad hoc Francisco Orrego Vicuña. By the same Order, the Tribunal made provision in respect of preliminary objections and for the filing of the written pleadings. The case was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 7.

View More Case concerning the Conservation and Sustainable Exploitation of Swordfish Stocks in the South-Eastern Pacific Ocean (Chile/European Union)

The “Monte Confurco” Case (Seychelles v. France), Prompt Release

On 27 November 2000, an Application under article 292 of the Convention was filed on behalf of Seychelles against France concerning the release of the fishing vessel Monte Confurco, flying the flag of Seychelles, and its Master. The case was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 6.

View More The “Monte Confurco” Case (Seychelles v. France), Prompt Release

Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Provisional Measures

On 30 July 1999, a Request for the prescription of provisional measures, pending the constitution of an arbitral tribunal, was filed by facsimile in the Registry of the Tribunal by New Zealand in accordance with article 290, paragraph 5, of the Convention, in a dispute against Japan concerning southern bluefin tuna. The Request was accompanied by a copy of a document dated 15 July 1999, instituting arbitral proceedings against Japan. The Request of New Zealand was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 3.

View More Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Provisional Measures

The M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea)

On 13 January 1998, a Request for the prescription of provisional measures, pending the constitution of an arbitral tribunal, was filed in the Registry of the Tribunal by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in accordance with article 290, paragraph 5, of the Convention. The Request was accompanied by a copy of a Notification submitted by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines to Guinea on 22 December 1997, instituting arbitral proceedings against Guinea in accordance with Annex VII to the Convention.

View More The M/V “SAIGA” (No. 2) Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea)

The M/V “SAIGA” Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Prompt Release

On 13 November 1997, an Application under article 292 of the Convention was filed in the Registry of the Tribunal by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines instituting proceedings against Guinea. The Application dealt with a dispute concerning the prompt release of the M/V Saiga, an oil tanker flying the flag of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, which was arrested on 28 October 1997 by Guinean customs patrol boats and detained in Conakry, Guinea. The case was entered in the list of cases as Case No. 1.

View More The M/V “SAIGA” Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Prompt Release